*Grounds
for filling Writ in the Court*
1. UGC
is following Qualifying Criteria for P1 +P2 = 50% & P3 =45%
from December 2006 exam to December 2011 exam. Why this time
it increased
Qualifying Criteria to overall 65%?
2. NET exam is
not like other Entrance exams, where only limited
seats are available & therefore it is necessary required
to declare the
cut-offs marks as per available seats. NET is just a
Qualifying Exam and
not an Entrance Test.
3. Further the
one subject is not similar to other subject . Why
should students of one subject suffer as papers of some
other subject were
easy and large no. of student from it qualified.
4. If the UGC is
declaring Cut-offs to 65%. Then why the UGC
allowing students who got 55% in Master degree for the NET
Exam.
5. UGC has power
to decide the cut of marks. However it cannot be
arbitrary. There must be some logic behind it. Normally first class i.e.
60% is held qualified for to be a faculty member even by
AICTE.
6. If UGC reduce
the cut-offs (say to 60% or 55%), Certainly it
will increase the number of qualified candidates in the
list, but It will
not dilute the standard of the purpose of UGC-net exam. All
who have
cleared are not going for jobs of teaching.
7. UGC result is
not based on any reasonable ground. The action of
UGC is arbitrary. More than six thousand candidates of
Management subject
qualified UGC NET examination held in June, 2012.
8. UGC declared on its official website that
the final criteria for
qualifying UGC NET
would be declared before the declaration of the final
result but UGC
declared the qualifying criteria after declaring the final
result.
9. UGC set very high percentage for
qualifying UGC NET just because
to reduce the number
of the NET qualified candidates and it has no other
reasonable ground.
10. UGC uploaded
answer keys of UGC NET in which many keys are crossed
by UGC. The marks of crossed answers should be given to all
the
candidates commonly but it is also not done and no marks are
given to the
candidates commonly.
this argument should be raised by all candidates before court and should fight for justice
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteUGC has no right to fix any aggregate minimum for a pass in the examination.If suppose UGC fix aggregate 95% for GEN 85% for OBC and 80% for SC/ST/PH/VH ,then Nobody will pass. Every thing should be specify before examination and not after declaration of the result. This is all India Test. If UGC fix aggregate 65% for GEN , then next time they will increase to 80%
ReplyDelete